Sports Coach Logo Sports Coach Logo

            topics

 

text Translator

 

 

site search facility

 


 

 


 

What the experts say

Nigel Hetherington reviews the latest research material relating to coaching, exercise physiology and athletic development.

Breathing - the easy way to assess endurance potential…

The first paper to catch my eye this month is one from Germany[1] that, in a sense, looked at chickens and eggs. Does an athlete's onset of hyperventilation come before or after the onset of the dreaded lactate pain? Indeed, is there any direct link at all? It is well understood in the world of sports physiology that lactate production increases with exercise intensity until, at a certain point, it takes off exponentially i.e. at a much higher rate - this point is the so-called Lactate Threshold'. Similarly, ventilation increases and takes off at a very similar point, called the 'Ventilatory Threshold'

If we can estimate our lactate threshold simply by observing when we start to hyperventilate then the potential practical benefits to the coach and athlete are vast. By comparing results from athletes before and after taking doses of sodium bicarbonate the authors suggest quite strongly that there is a very clear link since, after taking specifically measured doses of bicarbonate, which serves to buffer the blood and delay the onset of acidosis, all athletes experienced a delay in the onset of hyperventilation relative to the case before bicarbonate was taken. This seems to prove by cause and effect that hyperventilation occurs (can occur) as a direct result of exercise induced lactic acidosis. This implies that we can now estimate during training on the track, in a scientifically acceptable manner, where our lactate threshold is!! A further paper[2] that looked at which 'laboratory variable' best related to time trial performance in the Tour de France seems to back this up further. Based on a study of several cyclists in both the 1998 and 1999 event over 58km and 57km distances respectively, they found the only measure that gave a reliable relationship to actual power output (and hence individual time trial performance) was 'ventilatory threshold' (VT). Measurement also included, for example, both VO2 max and peak power output but neither of these two measures gave as good a 'result' as the 'VT'. So it seems that Bob Dylan was right all along… "The answer is blowing in the wind'!

Measuring functional strength…

On the subject of reliable tests for athletes one of the classic challenges is to identify a meaningful strength test that is a measure of functional strength that specifically relates to performance development for the legs. Many tests are bilateral and do not match the main unilateral nature of use of the legs in most sports. Hopping type tests are very useful but can place undesirable stresses on the knee, for example. A paper[3] published very recently reports on the use of a modified unilateral free-weight bearing squat test that may be used reliably to perform 1- and 3RM lifts. The test is based on the subject supporting a bar in the back-squat position but having one leg 'passive' and supported (Figure 1 below). The subjects completed squats to a 90degree knee angle and all gained familiarization with an unloaded bar before performing the actual test measurements. The test was deemed to be more reliable than the lunge test where the variability of loading between the back leg and front leg is more difficult to control. Since the exercise is performed on an isolated leg then it may also be used for rehabilitation purposes allowing specific comparison to the healthy leg.

Get eccentric for strengthening…

One of the main areas of injury in most athletes continues to be the hamstring muscle group. Many studies have tried to identify the cause(s). The hamstring is mainly active in a supportive capacity (i.e. eccentric - resisting leg flexion) in most sports and yet it is also largely the case that most leg strengthening exercises are based on concentric strengthening. Not surprisingly therefore the hamstring becomes most prone to injury when stressed eccentrically. The authors of a recent paper[4] propose a specific eccentric hamstring strengthening routine and associated equipment to overcome this shortfall. They go on to propose a specific link between delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS - based on micro-tears) and gross muscle tears. The hypothesis is that improved eccentric training can therefore reduce the risk of common hamstring strains. A further paper[5] found that in comparing the effects of concentric training versus eccentric training that the latter showed higher strength values, lower fatigue, lower increase in lactate and ammonia when either the knee or ankle joints were worked. This means that for the same work levels the body is producing fewer metabolites able to limit performance. Clearly we need more eccentrics in sport!!

Tips on refuelling…

Recovering from prolonged bouts of exercise clearly requires refuelling of the body and restoration of muscle glycogen levels. A review paper[6] looked at regimes for glycogen replenishment and concluded that best practice involves consuming carbohydrate regularly and as soon as possible after exercise such as every 30 minutes, at the rate of 1.2g to 1.5g per kg of bodyweight per hour. The review also found that evidence exists supporting higher glycogen storage rates by further supplementation with protein (0.2g per kg of bodyweight per hour). This also reduces the amount and frequency of carbohydrate required to around 0.8g per kg of bodyweight per hour to maximize glycogen storage. It is also concluded that consumption of protein will assist in limiting post exercise muscle damage, The final outcome is that following this regime will impact significantly on subsequent exercise performance. A study[7] based on endurance cyclists supports the review findings whereby 15 male cyclists underwent cycle ergometer rides firstly at 75% and then at 85% VO2 peak to exhaustion. During this time they consumed either a carbohydrate only (7.3% concentration) beverage or a similar beverage also containing protein (1.8%). In the first trial subjects on protein supplementation rode 29% longer (45.2mins vs. 32.6mins) and in the higher-level test rode a staggering 40% longer (43.6mins vs. 31.2 mins). Muscle damage was 83% lower with the beverage with added protein! It was not clear whether the performance outcome was due to higher caloric content or some, as yet, unknown protein-mediated mechanism So, any athlete involved in multiple rounds or several days of high-level activity of this nature should take note.

Protein - show me the whey to recover quickly…

Having identified the important role protein plays in an athlete's diet another paper[8] looks at how to choose the best! From an exhaustive survey, sources of proteins are considered and animal sources appear to have much in their favour although the study does not discount vegetable sources, except in the area of maintaining lean body mass. Positive health data does exist surrounding, for example, the consumption of soy protein. For athlete supplementation casein best supports prolonged protein synthesis but whey protein is better initially when it may be most needed for rapid recovery and repair. The author concludes that there is insufficient research data in this field to make too many strong arguments.

Living and performing off the fat…

Fat, the scourge of the endurance athlete is actually vital for ultra-endurance performance. Two recent papers[9,10] report on the benefits for such performers of moving away from the classical 'carbo-loading diet' to a high fat diet for anything up to 5-10 days before the event itself. Getting it right is the key. A 1-3 day high fat diet only actually serves to deplete muscle glycogen leaving the body less-well prepared to deal with the distance whereas 5-6 days of a high fat diet is sufficient to change the rate of fat oxidation within the body serving to eke out glycogen consumption. This simply does not benefit the 2-3 hour runner who can store sufficient glycogen and consume further quantities during the event to maintain effort levels for the whole event. However, for those events lasting longer than 4 hours the fat oxidation pathway becomes critical to performance and a high fat diet over the designed period may reap substantial rewards.

Essential nutrients can be derived from various components of a healthy and balanced diet and so it is interesting to review a paper[11] that looked at the effect of vegetarian diets on performance in strength sports. Among the conclusions the author derived from his review were:

  • There appears to be a preponderance of meat-eaters among strength athletes at the elite level. It is unclear whether this arose from noticeable benefits of meat consumption, a placebo effect of meat consumption, the confounding influence of supplement consumption, or some other cultural effect unrelated to any real benefit to performance.
  • Well-planned vegetarian diets, particularly those including milk and/or eggs, can provide all essential nutrients for good health and for a high level of sports performance.
  • The fact that vegetarian diets are associated with improved health outcomes compared to omnivorous diets does not necessarily imply that vegetarian diets are superior for performance in strength sports or any other strength-dependent activities. Indeed, in one recent study of resistance training in older males, omnivores had a bigger gain in muscle mass than vegetarians.
  • If meat consumption does enhance strength, the mechanism could be increased testosterone synthesis (possibly through intake of saturated fat) or increased storage of creatine phosphate in muscle.
  • There are several kinds of vegetarianism. Each could have a different effect on strength.

More on creatine…

A paper that looked specifically at an intensive sprint-cycling training regime[12] and the effects of creatine has reported improvements by as much as 6% in total work done in a series of 6s maximal bike sprints within an 80 minute window. Creatine was administered after the initial control measures for a period of 5 days in 20g / day doses. Increases in muscle concentrations were reported to be by as much as 48.9%.

And other ergogenic substances…

Another substance has appeared as a possible ergogenic aid in the shape of b-hydroxy-b-methylbutyrate (HMB) a metabolite of one of the essential amino acids leucine. The author[13] is less than convinced of its value especially in previously trained individuals.

Success at any cost…?

The whole field of ergogenic aids has been subjected to another substantial review[14] where the author summarises the findings of over 100 related scientific papers, some, in themselves, reviews. As well as reviewing the various classes of ergogenics the paper reports on the findings of a survey whereby 198 Olympic hopefuls were polled concerning the taking of banned substances. If the importance of winning was ever underestimated by anyone it most certainly cannot ever be so again. The response - of all those athletes 195 said they would take a banned substance that would ensure they would win and could not be detected. Far more frightening than this was the response that more than half of those polled said they would take such a substance if it guaranteed them winning every competition for the next five years even if it killed them after that time. The review concludes that it is important for all involved to stay up-to-date with supplements as they emerge. The FDA does not regulate for these substances and there is no means of ensuring the contents match their labels. On a personal note, I requested a copy of a certificate of analysis of a supplement from a supplier who said they were happy to supply one and that this would confirm that no 'banned substances were contained in the product'. What I received was a certificate alright, which may fool the layman, but in reality was nothing more than a standard 'white powder' assay conformity certificate and related in no way to the actual ingredients. Caveat emptor!

On a lighter note, or maybe not…

A recent report[15] suggests that a simple talent identification test may save the coach, the athlete and a lot of other people a lot of time, effort and money in the search for ultimate male power performer. Apparently, testosterone levels are related to the ratio between the lengths of a man's third finger to his index finger. The bigger the ratio the higher the testosterone level (which as we know enhances athletic performance). So check out your third finger - is it longer than your index finger?

Are sports medicine journals relevant and applicable to practitioners and athletes…?

In a paper by the same title a bold author[16] reviews four major journals. The conclusions he drew were: 'The most common topic was sports science, and very few studies related to the treatment of injuries and medical conditions. The majority of published articles used healthy subjects sampled from the sedentary population, and few studies have been carried out on injured participants. There is a dearth of studies addressing diagnostic and treatment interventions in the sports medicine literature. The evidence base for sports medicine must continue to increase in terms of volume and quality'

Sounds like someone wants to keep me busy with reviewing!!


References

  1. Meyer T et al. 'Is lactic acidosis a cause of exercise induced hyperventilation at the respiratory compensation point?' Br J Sports Med 38 (2004), 622-625
  2. Lucia A et al. 'Which laboratory variable is related with time trial performance time in the Tour de France?' Br J Sports Med 38 (2004), 636-640
  3. McCurdy K et al. ' The reliability of 1- and 3RM tests of unilateral strength in trained and untrained men and women' Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 3(3), 190-196, Sep 2004
  4. Brockett CL 'Human hamstring muscles adapt to eccentric exercise by changing optimum length' Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 33(5), 783-790, May 2001
  5. Horstmann T et al. 'Metabolic reaction after concentric and eccentric endurance-exercise of the knee and ankle' Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 33(5), 791-795, May 2001
  6. Ivy JL 'Regulation of muscle glycogen repletion, muscle protein synthesis and repair following exercise' Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 3(3), 131-138, Sep 2004
  7. Saunders MJ et al. 'Effects of a Carbohydrate-Protein Beverage on Cycling Endurance and Muscle Damage' Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 36(7) 1233-1238, July 2004
  8. Hoffmann JR and Falvo MJ 'Protein - Which is best?' Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 3(3), 118-130, Sep 2004
  9. Burke LM and Hawley JA 'Fat adaptation strategies for endurance performance. International' SportMed Journal 3(1), 2002
  10. Goedecke JH and Lambert EV 'Adaptation to a high-fat diet for endurance exercise: Review of potential underlying mechanisms' International SportMed Journal. 4(6), 2003
  11. Forbes-Ewan C 'Effect of vegetarian diets on performance in strength sports' Sportscience, Online June 2002
  12. Preen D et al. 'Effect of creatine loading on long-term sprint exercise performance and metabolism' Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 33(5), 814-821, May 2001
  13. Slater GJ 'b-Hydroxy-b-Methylbutyrate (HMB) as an ergogenic aid in sport. International SportMed Journal 2(6), 2001
  14. Tokish JM 'Ergogenic Aids: A Review of Basic Science, Performance, Side Effects, and Status in Sports' The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32, (2004), 1543-1553
  15. Tomkinson GR 'Testosterone talent test?' Sportscience, Online June 2003
  16. Bleakley C 'Are sports medicine journals relevant and applicable to practitioners and athletes?' Br J Sports Med 2004, 38, e23

Article Reference

This article first appeared in:

  • HETHERINGTON, N. (2004) What the experts say. Brian Mackenzie's Successful Coaching, (ISSN 1745-7513/ 17 / November), p. 12-14

Page Reference

If you quote information from this page in your work then the reference for this page is:

  • HETHERINGTON, N. (2004) What the experts say [WWW] Available from: https://www.brianmac.co.uk/articles/scni17a6.htm [Accessed

About the Author

Nigel Hetherington was the Head Track & Field Coach at the internationally acclaimed Singapore Sports School. He is a former National Performance Development Manager for Scottish Athletics and National Sprints Coach for Wales. Qualified and highly active as a British Athletics level 4 performance coach in all events he has coached athletes to National and International honours in sprints, hurdles as well as a World Record holder in the Paralympic shot. He has 10 years experience as senior coach educator and assessor trainer on behalf of British Athletics. Nigel is also an experienced athlete in sprint (World Masters Championship level) and endurance (3-hour marathon runner plus completed the 24 hour 'Bob Graham Round' ultra-endurance event up and down 42 mountain peaks in the English Lake District). He is a chartered chemist with 26 years' experience in scientific research and publishing.

Related Pages

The following Sports Coach pages provide additional information on this topic: