|
|
VO2max
Fitness can be measured by the volume of oxygen you can consume
while exercising at your maximum capacity. VO2max is the maximum amount of
oxygen in millilitres, one can use in one minute per kilogram of body weight.
Those who are fit have higher VO2max values and can exercise more intensely
than those who are not as well conditioned. Numerous studies show that you can
increase your VO2max by working out at an intensity that raises your heart
rate to between 65 and 85% of its maximum for at least 20 minutes three to five
times a week (referenced in French & Long (2012)[8]). A mean value of VO2max for male athletes is about 3.5
litres/minute and for female athletes it is about 2.7 litres/minute.
Factors affecting VO2max
The physical limitations that restrict the rate at which energy
can be released aerobically are dependent upon:
- the chemical ability of the muscular cellular tissue system to
use oxygen in breaking down fuels
- the combined ability of cardiovascular and pulmonary systems to
transport the oxygen to the muscular tissue system
|
 |
There are various physiological factors that combine to determine VO2max for which there are two theories:
Utilization Theory and Presentation Theory.
Utilization theory maintains that VO2max is determined by the body's ability to utilize the available oxygen whereas Presentation Theory maintains it is the ability of the body's cardiovascular system to deliver oxygen to active tissues.
A study by Saltin and Rowell (1980)[3] concluded that it is the delivery of oxygen to active tissues that is the major limiting factor to VO2max. A study by Gollnick et al. (1972)[4] showed a weak relationship between the body's ability to utilize the available oxygen and VO2max.
VO2max for various groups
The tables below, adapted from Wilmore and Costill (2005)[2], detail normative data for VO2max (ml/kg/min) in various population groups.
Non Athletes
| Age |
Male |
Female |
| 10-19 |
47-56 |
38-46 |
| 20-29 |
43-52 |
33-42 |
| 30-39 |
39-48 |
30-38 |
| 40-49 |
36-44 |
26-35 |
| 50-59 |
34-41 |
24-33 |
| 60-69 |
31-38 |
22-30 |
| 70-79 |
28-35 |
20-27 |
Athletes
| Sport |
Age |
Male |
Female |
| Baseball |
18-32 |
48-56 |
52-57 |
| Basketball |
18-30 |
40-60 |
43-60 |
| Cycling |
18-26 |
62-74 |
47-57 |
| Canoeing |
22-28 |
55-67 |
48-52 |
| Football (USA) |
20-36 |
42-60 |
|
| Gymnastics |
18-22 |
52-58 |
35-50 |
| Ice Hockey |
10-30 |
50-63 |
|
| Orienteering |
20-60 |
47-53 |
46-60 |
| Rowing |
20-35 |
60-72 |
58-65 |
| Skiing alpine |
18-30 |
57-68 |
50-55 |
| Skiing nordic |
20-28 |
65-94 |
60-75 |
| Soccer |
22-28 |
54-64 |
50-60 |
| Speed skating |
18-24 |
56-73 |
44-55 |
| Swimming |
10-25 |
50-70 |
40-60 |
| Track & Field - Discus |
22-30 |
42-55 |
|
| Track & Field - Running |
18-39 |
60-85 |
50-75 |
| Track & Field - Running |
40-75 |
40-60 |
35-60 |
| Track & Field - Shot |
22-30 |
40-46 |
|
| Volleyball |
18-22 |
|
40-56 |
| Weight Lifting |
20-30 |
38-52 |
|
| Wrestling |
20-30 |
52-65 |
|
Athlete's Vo2max Scores
The following are the Vo2max scores for a selection of the top female and male athletes.
| VO2max (ml/kg/min) |
Athlete |
Gender |
Sport/Event |
| 96.0 |
Espen Harald Bjerke |
Male |
Cross Country Skiing |
| 96.0 |
Bjorn Daehlie |
Male |
Cross Country Skiing |
| 92.5 |
Greg LeMond |
Male |
Cycling |
| 92.0 |
Matt Carpenter |
Male |
Marathon Runner |
| 92.0 |
Tore Ruud Hofstad |
Male |
Cross Country Skiing |
| 91.0 |
Harri Kirvesniem |
Male |
Cross Country Skiing |
| 88.0 |
Miguel Indurain |
Male |
Cycling |
| 87.4 |
Marius Bakken |
Male |
5K Runner |
| 85.0 |
Dave Bedford |
Male |
10K Runner |
| 85.0 |
John Ngugi |
Male |
Cross Country Runner |
| |
|
|
|
| 73.5 |
Greta Waitz |
Female |
Marathon runner |
| 71.2 |
Ingrid Kristiansen |
Female |
Marathon Runner |
| 67.2 |
Rosa Mota |
Female |
Marathon Runner |
VO2max and age
As we get older our VO2max decreases. A study by Jackson et al. (1995)[5] found the average decrease was 0.46 ml/kg/min per year for men (1.2%) and 0.54 ml/kg/min for women (1.7%). The decline is due to a number of factors including a reduction in maximum heart rate and maximum stoke volume.
VO2max and performance
VO2max on its own is a poor predictor of performance but using the velocity (vVO2max) and duration (tlimvVO2max) that an athlete can operate at their VO2max will provide a better indication of performance.
VO2max evaluation tests
An estimate of your VO2max can be determined using any of the following
tests:
Improving your VO2max
The following are samples of Astrands (a work physiologists)
workouts for improving oxygen uptake:
- (1) - Run at maximum speed for 5 minutes. Note the
distance covered in that time. Let us assume that the distance achieved is 1900
metres. Rest for 5 minutes, and then run the distance (1900 metres) 20%
slower, in other words in 6 minutes, with 30 seconds rest, repeated many
times. This is equal to your 10 Km pace
- (2) - Run at maximum speed for 4 minutes. Note the
distance covered in that time. Rest for 4 minutes. In this case, we will
assume you run a distance of 1500 metres. Now run the same distance 15% slower,
in other words in 4 minutes 36 seconds, with 45 seconds rest, repeated several
times. This approximates to a time between the athlete's 5 Km and 10 Km
time
- (3) - Run at maximum effort for 3 minute. Note the
distance covered in that time. The distance covered is, say 1000 metres.
Successive runs at that distance are taken 10% slower or at 3 minutes 18
seconds, with 60 seconds rest, repeated several times. This approximates to
your 5 Km time
- (4) - Run at maximum effort for 5 minutes. Note the
distance covered in that time. The distance covered is 1900 metres. Rest 5
minutes. The distance is now covered 5% slower with 1½ minutes
rest. This is approximately 3K pace for you, i.e., 5 minutes 15 seconds/1900
metres
- (5) - Run at maximum effort for 3 minutes. The
distance covered is 1100 metres. When recovered, the athlete then runs the same
distance 5% slower, i.e., 3 minutes 9 seconds/1100 metres, with a
minute rest, repeated several times. This is at 3 Km pace
When and how often
It is suggested that in the winter sessions (1) and (2) are
done weekly, and in the track season sessions (3), (4) and (5) are done weekly
by runners from 800 metres to the half-marathon. Although it would be
convenient to use the original distance marks made by the duration efforts,
this does not take into account the athlete's condition before each session, so
the maximum effort runs must be done on each occasion when they may be either
more or less than the previous distance run. The maximum duration efforts are
in themselves quality sessions. If the pulse rate has not recovered to 120
beats per minute in the rest times given, the recovery period should be
extended before the repetitions are started. The recovery times between the
repetitions should be strictly adhered to. These workouts make a refreshing change
from repetition running. When all five sessions are completed within a month,
experience shows substantial improvements in performance.
The effect of altitude
VO2 max decreases as altitude increases above 1600m and for every 1000m above 1600m maximal oxygen uptake decreases by approximately 8-11%. The decrease is mainly due to a decrease in maximal cardiac output (product of heart rate and stroke volume). Stoke volume decreases due to the immediate decrease in blood plasma volume.
VO2max Assessment
Normative data for VO2max in 1997
Normative data (Heywood 1998)[6] for Female (values in ml/kg/min)
| Age |
Very Poor |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
Superior |
| 13-19 |
<25 |
25 - 30 |
31 - 34 |
35 - 38 |
39 - 41 |
>41 |
| 20-29 |
<24 |
24 - 28 |
29 - 32 |
33 - 36 |
37 - 41 |
>41 |
| 30-39 |
<23 |
23 - 27 |
28 - 31 |
32 - 36 |
37 - 40 |
>40 |
| 40-49 |
<21 |
21 - 24 |
25 - 28 |
29 - 32 |
33 - 36 |
>36 |
| 50-59 |
<20 |
20 - 22 |
23 - 26 |
27 - 31 |
32 - 35 |
>35 |
| 60+ |
<17 |
17 - 19 |
20 - 24 |
25 - 29 |
30 - 31 |
>31 |
Normative data (Heywood 1998)[6] for Male (values in ml/kg/min)
| Age |
Very Poor |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
Superior |
| 13-19 |
<35 |
35 - 37 |
38 - 44 |
45 - 50 |
51 - 55 |
>55 |
| 20-29 |
<33 |
33 - 35 |
36 - 41 |
42 - 45 |
46 - 52 |
>52 |
| 30-39 |
<31 |
31 - 34 |
35 - 40 |
41 - 44 |
45 - 49 |
>49 |
| 40-49 |
<30 |
30 - 32 |
33 - 38 |
39 - 42 |
43 - 47 |
>48 |
| 50-59 |
<26 |
26 - 30 |
31 - 35 |
36 - 40 |
41 - 45 |
>45 |
| 60+ |
<20 |
20 - 25 |
26 - 31 |
32 - 35 |
36 - 44 |
>44 |
Normative data for VO2max in 2005
Normative data (Heywood 2006)[7] for Female (values in ml/kg/min)
| Age |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
Superior |
| 20 - 29 |
<36 |
36 - 39 |
40 - 43 |
44 - 49 |
>49 |
| 30 - 39 |
<34 |
34 - 36 |
37 - 40 |
41 - 45 |
>45 |
| 40 - 49 |
<32 |
32 - 34 |
35 - 38 |
39 - 44 |
>44 |
| 50 - 59 |
<25 |
25 - 28 |
29 - 30 |
31 - 34 |
>34 |
| 60 - 69 |
<26 |
26 - 28 |
29 - 31 |
32 - 35 |
>35 |
| 70 - 79 |
<24 |
24 - 26 |
27 - 29 |
30 - 35 |
>35 |
Normative data (Heywood 2006)[7] for Male (values in ml/kg/min)
| Age |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
Superior |
| 20 - 29 |
<42 |
42 - 45 |
46 - 50 |
51 - 55 |
>55 |
| 30 - 39 |
<41 |
41 - 43 |
44 - 47 |
48 - 53 |
>53 |
| 40 - 49 |
<38 |
38 - 41 |
42 - 45 |
46 - 52 |
>52 |
| 50 - 59 |
<35 |
35 - 37 |
38 - 42 |
43 - 49 |
>49 |
| 60 - 69 |
<31 |
31 - 34 |
35 - 38 |
39 - 45 |
>45 |
| 70 - 79 |
<28 |
28 - 30 |
31 - 35 |
36 - 41 |
>41 |
% MHR and %VO2max
It is possible to estimate your exercise intensity as a
percentage of VO2max from your training heart rate.
A study by David Swain et al. (1994)[1] using statistical procedures
examined the relationship between %MHR and %VO2max. Their results led to the
following regression equation:
- %MHR = 0.64 × %VO2max + 37
The relationship has been shown to hold true across sex, age
and activity.
%VO2max and Speed
| % of VO2max |
Speed |
| 50 |
Very slow running |
| 60 |
Slow running |
| 70 |
Steady running |
| 80 |
Half Marathon speed |
| 90 |
10 km speed |
| 95 |
5 km speed |
| 100 |
3 km speed |
| 110 |
1500 metres to 800 metres speed |
Free Calculator
- %VO2max to %MHR
Calculator - a free Microsoft Excel spreadsheet which you can download and
use on your computer. The spreadsheet will be loaded into a new window.
Referenced Material
- SWAIN et al (1994) Target HR for the development of CV
fitness. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 26 (1), p. 112-116
- WILMORE, J.H. and COSTILL, D.L. (2005) Physiology of Sport and Exercise. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
- SALTIN, B. and ROWELL, L.B. (1980) Functional adaptations to physical activity and inactivity. Federation Proceeding. 39 (5), p. 1506-1513
- GOLLNICK, P.D. et al. (1972) Enzyme activity and fiber composition in skeletal muscle of untrained and trained men. J Appl Physiol., 33 (3), p. 312-319
- JACKSON, A.S. et al. (1995) Changes in aerobic power of men, ages 25-70 yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc., 27 (1), p. 113-120
- HEYWOOD, V. (1998) The Physical Fitness Specialist
Certification Manual, The Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, Dallas TX,
revised 1997. In: HEYWOOD, V (1998) Advance Fitness Assessment & Exercise Prescription,
3rd Ed. Leeds: Human Kinetics. p. 48
- HEYWOOD, V. (2006) The Physical Fitness Specialist
Manual, The Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, Dallas TX,
revised 2005. In: HEYWOOD, V (2006) Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise Prescription, Fifth Edition, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- FRENCH, J. and LONG, M. (2012) How to improve your VO2max. Athletics Weekly, November 8 2012, p.53
Page Reference
The reference for this page is:
- MACKENZIE, B. (2001) VO2max [WWW] Available from: http://www.brianmac.co.uk/vo2max.htm [Accessed
Associated Pages
The following Sports Coach pages should be read in conjunction with this page:
|
|