![]() |
|
||||||||
|
|
Competitive AnxietyCompetition can cause athletes to react both physically (somatic) and mentally (cognitive) in a manner which can negatively affect their performance abilities. Stress, arousal and anxiety are terms used to describe this condition. The major problem in competition is letting your mind work against you rather than for you. You must accept anxiety symptoms as part and parcel of the competition experience; only then will anxiety begin to facilitate your performance.
Anxiety - Performance Relationship TheoryDrive TheoryAccording to the Drive Theory (Zajonc 1965) [7] if an athlete is appropriately skilled then it will help them to perform well if their drive to compete is aroused - they are "psyched up". Inverted-U hypothesisAn alternative approach to Drive Theory is known as the Inverted-U hypothesis (Yerkes 1908) [2] that predicts a relationship between arousal and performance approximates to an inverted U shape. The theory is that as arousal is increased then performance improves but only up to a certain point (top of the inverted U). If the athlete's arousal is increased beyond this point then performance diminishes. Multi-dimensional Anxiety TheoryMulti-dimensional Anxiety Theory (Martens 1990) [3] is based on the distinction between cognitive anxiety and somatic anxiety. The theory makes a series of predictions:
Catastrophe TheoryCatastrophe Theory (Hardy 1987) [6] suggests that:
Optimum Arousal TheoryAccording to the Optimum Arousal Theory (Hanin 1997) [4] each athlete will perform at their best if their level of arousal or competitive anxiety falls within their optimum functioning zone. The challenge for the coach is to determine the athlete's zone and identify the techniques that will place the athlete in this zone prior to competition. How do you measure Anxiety?A range of psychometric tests or sport anxiety questionnaires (SAQ) have been used by sports psychologists to understand and measure this condition. Spielberger (1966) [5] argued that it was necessary to make a distinction between momentary states and more permanent traits.
Marten (1990) developed anxiety traits (A-trait) questionnaires that were tailored specially to sport known as the Sport Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT). Marten (1990) recognised that any measure of sport anxiety must take into consideration cognitive anxiety (negative thoughts, worry) and somatic anxiety (physiological response). The Competitive State Anxiety Inventory or CSAI-2 takes into account the difference between A-state and A-trait and distinguishes between cognitive and somatic anxiety.
Symptoms of AnxietyAnxiety can be recognised on three levels (Karageorghis 2007) [1]:
How can we control Anxiety?As we can see anxiety includes state and trait dimensions both of which can show themselves as cognitive and somatic symptoms. An athlete with high anxiety trait (A-trait) is likely to be more anxious in stressful situations. To help the athlete control competitive anxiety somatic techniques (relaxation) and cognitive techniques (mental imagery) can be used. The five breath techniqueThis exercise can be performed while you are standing up, lying down or sitting upright. You should inhale slowly, deeply and evenly through your nose, and exhale gently through your mouth as though flickering, but not extinguishing, the flame of a candle (Karageorghis 2007):
Benson's relaxation responseBenson's technique is a form of meditation that can be used to attain quite a deep sense of relaxation and can be ideal for staying calm in between rounds of a competition. It can be mastered with just a few weeks' practice and comprises of seven easy steps (Karageorghis 2007):
Referenced Material
Page ReferenceThe reference for this page is:
Associated PagesThe following Sports Coach pages should be read in conjunction with this page: |
|
|||||||