Sports Coach Logo Sports Coach Logo

            topics

 

text Translator

 

 

site search facility

 


 

 


 

Goal & Process Motivation

Dr Matt Long and David Lowes spent time with Olympic champion David Hemery CBE who provided an insight into his winning mentality

It is October 15, 1968 and in the high altitude of Mexico City a 24-year-old British athlete wearing number 402 is settled in his blocks out in lane six as he attempts to become Olympic champion over 400m hurdles. Now 44 years later, we analyse the reflections of David Hemery in his finest hour through recourse to the tool of Reversal Theory.

Reversal Theory

Reversal Theory was originally proposed almost four decades ago by the psychologist Dr Michael Apter [2] and consultant child psychiatrist Dr Kenneth Smith. In 1975, this pairing developed a model of human motivation which articulated two basic and opposite motivational states. The underlying philosophy of this theory rejected conventional psychological wisdom by espousing that individuals are not rigidly fixed in terms of definitive personality 'traits' but rather they may have two fundamental 'states' of mind which can be alternated when triggered.

Telic and Paratelic states

In its simplest terms, 'Telic' is indicative of goal-focussed motivation and behaviour whereas 'Paretelic' is a process focussed motivation and behaviour. For example, the telic state of a javelin thrower may be to exceed 70 metres. This will have been pre-planned and agreed with the coach and will fit into a wider microcycle of periodised training.

The paratelic behaviour of the same javelin thrower may kick in, when during competition, this goal fades into the background. They may be feeling the grip of the javelin in their right palm as their number is called to throw or experiencing the rush of adrenaline as a Diamond League crowd begins to clap rhythmically. The goal has been momentarily forgotten and the 'here-and-now' is everything. In describing how a shift between polar states can be effected, internationally-respected coach educator Peter Thompson (2006) offers the analogy of a light switch, "Just as the switch on the wall can be either 'on' or 'off', the two stable positions in all of us are opposites" and can be reversed.

Telic Paratelic

Figure 1: Telic and Paratelic state reversals. Adapted from Apter and Smith (1979)

Pre-race

In pre-competition mode, Hemery reflects that he was in a 'telic' state of mind with a clear goal focus, "Prior to the start, the aim was to deliver a world record paced run and I hoped that would be good enough to win. My goal focus was to avoid losing." This is significant in that his own doctoral research (published as 'Sporting Excellence' in 1991) involved interviewing 83 elite athletes across 22 sports and 12 nationalities, including the likes of golfer Nick Faldo and tennis player Stefan Edberg. While 60 per cent of interviewees were aiming to win, the other 40 per cent saw themselves as winners who wanted to avoid losing. David's self-categorisation into the latter 40 per cent suggests that retention of his own self-image was one of avoiding the label of 'loser'.

In his autobiography, Another Hurdle (1976) he recalls that in the medical room, "I was practically paralytic with fear." Interestingly, he remembers that both he and eventual bronze medallist John Sherwood, "were able to crack bad jokes in our attempt to relieve the tension." Thompson (2006) articulates how the use of humour is a key trigger in shifting athletes from high arousal telic states of anxiety towards the high arousal paratelic state of excitement. With 50 minutes to go before the race, Hemery's book recounts a conscious attempt to move away from the goal focussed telic state towards the paratelic while at the warm-up track, "I took off my shoes and jogged around the grass. The damp under my feet took me back 12 months to the time when I had been running on the edge of the water along the firm sand (of a beach in the USA). I tried to recapture some of the joyful and enthusiastic thoughts and feelings I had experienced."

The man who would eventually hang up his spikes with a complete set of Olympic medals continues, "The delivery was in a controlled state of fear! The more nervous I was for a race, the faster I ran. I did attempt to take controlled self-management of that state - in the waiting room 20 minutes before the race, reducing my heart rate through slow breathing, focusing on what I could control." According to Hanin (1997) [3] to perform their 'optimum arousal' level, the anxiety of an athlete has to fall within their 'optimum functioning zone.' Additionally, Hardy and Frazer's Catastrophe Theory (1987)[4] articulates how each athlete will respond differently to competitive anxiety. In contrast to both catastrophe theory and optimal arousal theory, Reversal theory allows us to see how Hemery's 'understandable' nerves could be turned into a state of very high arousal and excitement of the kind productive for world-class performance.

The Olympic champion's use of controlled breathing is indicative of the five breath technique articulated by Karageorghis (2007)[5]. It is most likely that he was a 'paratelic dominant' athlete who was most responsive when the challenges presented the highest level of arousal. He added, "I avoided looking at the opposition or getting drawn into their nervous jogging in that very small space." This ability not to get sucked into displacement activities which may be detrimental to optimum performance is indicative of the kind of 'emotional control' described by Brian Mackenzie (1997)[6] which is maintained despite considerable distractions.

The Race

Hemery's account of the 48.12 between gun and Olympic immortality is one of a constant switching between the aforementioned telic and paratelic states. He clearly launched out in the latter state as he recalls, "The primary focus was internal pace judgement and stride pattern/stride length focus." BBC's animated and emotional broadcaster David Coleman is shouting into his microphone, "Hemery is gambling on everything, he is really flying down the back straight." A reversal back to the telic goal focused state seems to have occurred in those early stages as Hemery recalls, "I passed one of the pre-race favourites, Ron Whitney before hurdle three who was one lane outside of me in lane seven. I thought he had gone off slowly but would probably then be tagging onto my shoulder as I went by." This momentary shift was quickly reversed back to the paratelic state with Hemery saying, "I refocused on maintaining my speed and strides through to hurdle six." This was necessary in order to make a necessary technical adjustment to alter the stride pattern from 13 to 15, "which is when I needed to take 12 inches (30cm) off each stride, following a normal take-off and landing. It also meant accelerating the cadence in order to avoid losing too much momentum," he added. His book recounts how, "I felt as if I were running in slow motion as I saw every inch of where I had to place my feet. I was vividly conscious of myself, the red tartan surface and the hurdles on that final bend." A reversal towards the telic occurred while he was, "briefly conscious of passing John Sherwood who was out in lane eight, but that was more as a pace judgement marker."

Late into the race, Hemery experienced a reversal towards the paratelic, due to the rainy conditions which had occurred between 4pm and 6pm on the day of the final. He recalls, "After hurdle seven I was again distracted externally when I heard a foot splash in a puddle, which sounded as if it were only a few feet behind me, to my left." The triggering of this paratelic experience by an environmental cue appears to have instantaneously triggered a reversal back to the telic state as he vividly remembers, "My intent was to win, so it was a blessing as it sent a shock and a shot of adrenalin through me that I hadn't got away from the rest of the field." Once again, anxiety appears to have been an appropriate motivator of the man who would go on to be remembered as one of Britain's best 'Superstars' between 1973 and 1977, with the telic state coming to the fore. He continues that, "I did have a potentially negative thought coming into that eighth hurdle, that I wasn't sure that I could hold the pace and a calm rational thought came back, 'you have to, this is the Olympic final!' "

Even as the tape loomed, one last reversal from telic to paratelic seems to have occurred with the looming Olympic gold being momentarily forgotten in favour of more process motivated thoughts. "As I stepped over the final barrier, on landing I remembered that Billy Smith, my US coach, had written to say, 'go at the last hurdle as if it's the first in a high hurdles race.' The fact that I had forgotten made me try to change into a sprint, which I didn't feel was a sprint. It was as fast a stride as I could muster to the line."

Coleman was screaming into his microphone, "Hemery won that from start to finish. He killed the rest, he paralysed them!" Over four decades later, a modest Hemery, Vice Chairman of the British Olympic Association jokes that, "I only looked good because the others faded!" He crossed the line almost a second ahead of West German silver medalist, Gerhard Hennige and stopped the clock in a world record which catapulted him to the crown of 1968 BBC Sports Personality of the Year.

Conclusions

This article has challenged us to consider the following:

  • Rather than having fixed personality traits, athletes can be shifted between two polar mental states, namely telic and paratelic.
  • Elite level performers like Hemery experience multiple reversals between psychological states both prior to and during intense world class competition.
  • The task of both coach and athlete is to develop awareness of both extrinsic and intrinsic cues which can trigger reversals which positively utilise anxiety and optimise performance.


References

  1. LONG, M & LOWES, D. (2012) Mental Hurdles. Athletics Weekly, June 7th 2012, p. 34-35
  2. APTER, M. J. (1997) Reversal theory: What is it?; The Psychologist, 10 (5)
  3. HANIN, Y.L. (1997) Emotions and athletic performance: individual zones of optimal functioning. European Year Book of sports psychology, 1, p. 29-72
  4. HARDY, L. and FRAZER, J. (1987) The Inverted U Hypothesis: A catastrophe for sport psychology? British Association of Sports Science, monograph no. 1, NCF, 1987
  5. KARAGEORGHIS, C. (2007) Competition anxiety needn't get you down. Peak Performance, 243, p. 4-7
  6. MACKENZIE, B. (1997) Psychology [WWW] Available from: https://www.brianmac.co.uk/psych.htm [Accessed 01/6/2012]

Page Reference

If you quote information from this page in your work then the reference for this page is:

  • LONG, M. and LOWES, D. (2012) Goal & Process Motivation [WWW] Available from: https://www.brianmac.co.uk/articles/article133.htm [Accessed

Article Reference

The information on this page is adapted from Long & Lowes (2012)[1] with the kind permission of the authors and Athletics Weekly.

About the Author

Dr. Matt Long is a British Athletics Coach Education Tutor. David Lowes is a former international athlete, Level 4 coach and Coaching Editor of AW.

David Hemery is founder of the Charity, 21st Century Legacy, an educational programme for schools, challenging young people to 'Be the best you can be'!

Related Pages

The following Sports Coach pages provide additional information on this topic: